Furtive glances. Stiff smiles. That little lean back in a chair that says, “Whatever you do, don’t call on me.”
If you’ve been in enough meetings, you can feel it instantly: the quiet that isn’t calm, it’s caution.
And it’s happening in conference rooms and Zoom grids everywhere.
It has nothing to do with talent or capability either. Workplaces are full of smart, committed professionals who care about their work — yet meeting after meeting, their voices are muted. Literally and figuratively. And many leaders assume this quiet is about employee confidence.
It isn’t.
If anything, the exchange in your meetings is the clearest window into your leadership style. When meetings are quiet, it’s rarely by accident; it’s a reflection of what’s been rewarded or what people perceive will be punished.
According to a study by DecisionWise, 34 percent of employees in the U.S. don’t speak up because of fear of retribution. And if your team rarely challenges ideas, asks questions, offers alternatives, or raises issues? It may be time to look in the mirror.
This is not about shame and blame, leaders. It’s about awareness, power dynamics, and the way you can either expand or shrink the space around you.
After two decades coaching emerging leaders, interviewing top executives, and writing leadership books — most recently “Quick Leadership: Build Trust, Navigate Change, and Cultivate Unstoppable Teams”, here’s what I tell my clients:
The quieter your team is, the more they’re managing you instead of contributing to the work.
They’re calculating risk. Gaging the temperature. Deciding if psychological safety is real or just something mentioned one time in manager training.
And when employees default to self-protection, let’s just say innovation dies long before a bad idea ever hits the whiteboard!
Why good people go quiet
People stay silent because at some point, they learned it was safer.
They’ve seen what happens to the person who disagrees too openly. They’ve watched input get punished, not rewarded. They’ve noticed who gets airtime — and who gets interrupted.
They’ve learned the meeting game: Speak carefully. Speak rarely. Speak last…Or not at all!
In fact, a McKinsey study found that only 26 percent of employees feel safe speaking up with concerns or mistakes. Leaders love to tell employees “stand out,” “speak up,” and “take initiative.” But if your reactions — open annoyance, eye rolls or hostility — teach them the opposite, your words stop mattering.
People notice how you act, respond, and interact far more than what you say in speeches.
The micromanagement trap
The most well-intentioned leaders cause silence without realizing it. They want things done well, so they constantly put their stamp on contributions and work, “adding value” even if it only makes it 5 percent better.
In meetings, frequent status updates, check-ins, or reviews can turn into a subtle micromanagement moment. When you sit in on most discussions or regularly question decisions, you send the same message as hovering over work: I don’t trust you to take ownership. And data backs this up: according to a Monster survey, 73 percent of workers view micromanagement as the biggest workplace red flag, and one of the main pain-points is house-keeping or status meetings that feel unnecessary.
But here’s the hidden impact:
Every time you “finish” someone’s work for them, in a meeting or elsewhere, you teach them to stop trying. You may think you’re improving quality. What you’re really doing is shrinking initiative and reinforcing dependence.
The mindset shift that will affirm your belonging in any workplace
This is especially true for women, people of color, first-gen professionals, and younger workers who already worry about proving they belong. If your team feels like their work is never “enough,” they stop taking creative risks and start aiming for safe, small thinking.
This is the opposite of excellence.
Signals You Might Be Stifling Initiative
How do you know if your leadership is unintentionally shutting people down?
Look for these signals:









