Proceedings in the capital murder case against Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer, can be televised, a Utah judge ruled Friday, rejecting an effort by Robinson’s defense to bar cameras from the courtroom but granting a requested delay to preliminary hearings slated for later this month.
Robinson, 23, has not yet entered a plea and faces the death penalty if convicted.
His attorneys argued at an April hearing before Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graf that a future jury pool had already been tainted by sensationalist media coverage surrounding Kirk’s death and the trial, and by statements from prosecutors and federal and state officials who had publicly declared Robinson’s guilt.
The case has attracted significant media attention, from both mainstream outlets and an emerging ecosystem of popular online conspiracist creators — including Kirk’s former friend and employee, Candace Owens — who are covering the proceedings from an avowedly biased position: that Robinson is not just innocent, but a patsy in a secret plot orchestrated by a powerful shadow cabal that includes the U.S. and foreign governments.
These conspiracy theories have been the subject of viral online content over the past seven months, spun up in videos and social media posts that can attract millions of views and have already crept into court hearings. State prosecutors, attorneys for Kirk’s widow, Erika, and a coalition of news organizations have cited the conspiratorial content in arguing that a ban on cameras would only worsen matters.
Prosecutors made the point in April.
“Mischief lurks in the dark,” said Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride. “Let’s shine a light on these proceedings, a bright light, so the public can have confidence in what happens in this courtroom.”
An expert witness called by the defense in April criticized what he described as speculative and sensationalist media coverage of the Robinson case thus far, characterizing it as inflammatory and sometimes overstating, mistating or making up details about events, evidence, Robison’s state of mind or character, and in general, furthering the prosecution’s narrative. The expert, Bryan Edelman, a California-based trial consultant, pointed to inflammatory statements from Donald Trump and former Attorney General Pam Bondi and calls for Robinson’s execution by other senior Trump administration officials.
Aside from allowing cameras, Graf also ruled on the defense’s request to delay a preliminary hearing, initially scheduled for May 18, at which prosecutors plan to present evidence of probable cause that the case should move to trial. Those hearings are now set to begin on July 6.
Robinson’s attorneys had asked for a monthslong delay to review thousands of files, hundreds of hours of video and terabytes of digital data turned over by prosecutors. The defense also said it could not proceed without the data from federal law enforcement agencies’ DNA analysis.









