The Department of Homeland Security is now officially — technically — in a shutdown, marking the third funding lapse of President Donald Trump’s second term.
Solving this one could take a while.
After two weeks of negotiations between Democrats and Republicans across Pennsylvania Avenue, lawmakers left Washington on Thursday without a deal to fund the sprawling department, all but ensuring the lights would turn off at the week’s end.
Now, with both parties digging in on changes to the controversial Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, it’s anyone’s guess when the lights will come back on.
Congressional Democrats and the White House have traded proposals — with another expected in the coming days — but the exchanges have produced few agreements, prompting the White House to direct DHS to shut operations down in a document sent to the agency late Friday afternoon..
A big part of the problem is that Democrats see little incentive for funding DHS. The DHS funding bill covers roughly 4% of federal agency spending, and while many of the agencies that could be affected by a funding lapse are the ones that Democrats support, approving any new funding for the agencies where Democrats want reforms has become politically toxic.
Those more controversial agencies — like ICE and Customs and Border Protection — are set to continue operations despite the shutdown. (ICE and CBP received billions of dollars from the GOP’s reconciliation bill over the summer, leaving them awash in cash for the time being and taking away some of the urgency driving negotiations.)
Meanwhile, those agencies Democrats largely support — like the Coast Guard, the Secret Service, the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency — are most at risk of feeling the effects of a shutdown.
Heading into the weekend, a deal to fund the agencies through the fiscal year, which ends in September, remains elusive.
“I know what they want. I know what they can live with. The Democrats have gone crazy,” Trump said at the White House on Friday. “They’re radical left lunatics. That’s why their cities are so unsafe. The blue cities are the cities that are unsafe. So we have to protect our law enforcement.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., fired back on Friday, castigating the White House’s offer as “unserious.”
“The reason why we’re confronting the possibility of a shutdown in a few hours is because Republicans are unwilling to enact change that is dramatic,” Jeffries told reporters. “We believe any changes should be bold, should be meaningful, should be dramatic, should be transformational, should get ICE completely and totally under control.”
Jeffries said he expects House and Senate Democrats to “jointly” respond to the White House’s proposal, declining to offer details on timing or substance other than to say the party is “working feverishly.”
It will be the latest legislative ping-pong, after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., kicked off negotiations by unveiling a list of 10 demands, including mandating officers to remove their masks and turn on the body cameras, requiring judicial warrants for entering private property, and establishing a use of force policy.
After the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis at the hands of federal immigration agents last month, Democrats in both chambers said they would not support new funding for DHS without significant reforms to how ICE operates, thwarting what was on track to be a drama-free government funding exercise.
Republicans quickly panned the Democrats’ requests, especially the masks provision, which Democrats saw as an easy ask during the talks. Scores of GOP lawmakers — from moderates to hardliners — raised concerns about federal agents being doxxed, a sign of the treacherous terrain to come.
“They just put a laundry list out of impossible demands, and they knew it,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., told MS NOW on Thursday.
The White House responded this week with an offer of their own, which both parties have refused to describe in full. Now, Democrats are prepping their latest entreaty.









