A king who has spent his life perfecting the stiff upper lip is about to spend four days in a nation led by a president who has never met an impulse he didn’t broadcast.
Official royal visits, especially those involving Britain’s monarch, are traditionally an occasion for pomp and pageantry — displays of ceremonial flourish and, yes, jewels — while substantive issues are tackled behind the scenes. The state visit scheduled to begin Monday in Washington is something else.
The frictions surrounding it are front-page news. On Saturday, a security incident forced the evacuation of President Donald Trump and other U.S. officials from a televised dinner. Bilateral tensions over Iran remain unresolved. The Jeffrey Epstein scandal hangs over both the U.S. and U.K. governments. And there’s the question of whether Trump — who was recently willing to engage in a war of words with the pope — will maintain better behavior for his royal guests.
King Charles III and Queen Camilla are set to arrive Monday afternoon for a four-day trip. The agenda spans events in Washington, D.C.; New York; and Virginia and includes a state dinner, a review of troops, an address to Congress, inspection of the White House beehive and a wreath laying at the 9/11 memorial. Receptions for literature — a favorite topic of Camilla’s — and bilateral business and finance interests, as well as a national park visit and a horseracing event (another love of Camilla’s) are also on the calendar.
Officially, the couple are marking the 250th anniversary of American independence — that is, arriving to praise the United States’ success declaring independence from Charles’ ancestor, King George III, in 1776.
Unofficially, the couple are on a diplomatic charm offensive, seeking to smooth bilateral relations with Trump, who has been publicly critical of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s refusal to partner on military action against Iran.
While there is some inherent awkwardness in praising a country that ditched the crown and became a global superpower, Charles knows his role: radiate kingly statesmanship and appeal to Trump, whose fondness for British royalty has led him to lavish praise on Charles and his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II. The trip itself is, in some ways, a bet that majesty can do what diplomacy has not.
Charles, who was heir to the throne for a record 70 years during his mother’s seven-decade reign, has experience with challenging diplomatic missions. He spoke at the 1997 ceremony marking the end of British control of Hong Kong. He acknowledged the “appalling atrocity of slavery which forever stains our history” as Barbados became an independent republic in 2021 and cast off the British monarch as head of state. While a prince, Charles generated plenty of negative headlines over his opinions, such as public remarks about architecture and his reference to Chinese Communist officials at the Hong Kong handover as “appalling old waxworks.” As king, he has hewed to more benign pronouncements. (So criticism of Trump’s controversial ballroom project — and the destruction of the White House East Wing that enabled it — is unlikely.)
Although this is Charles’ first visit to the States as monarch, he has traveled to the U.S. 20 times since 1970, he noted in a toast during Trump’s visit to England last September. (“Had the media succeeded in the 1970s in their own attempt at deepening the ‘special relationship,’ I myself might have been married off within the Nixon family,” the king joked, a reference to Tricia Nixon, elder daughter of then-President Richard Nixon, who accompanied Charles and his sister, Anne, the Princess Royal, to events.)
This visit follows a safe precedent: Charles’ parents, Elizabeth and Prince Philip, made a similar visit for the U.S. bicentennial in 1976. At a dinner with then-President Gerald Ford, the queen toasted the “new chapter in history” that followed the revolution and the two countries’ shared language, traditions and “common vision of what is right and just.” References to a mutual commitment to democracy and freedom, and praise for Trump’s British heritage are likely to be heard over the next few days.
The timing, however, is awkward on a high-profile front: The Epstein scandal continues to be front-page news in Britain.
Recommended
For years, an association with Epstein hung over the king’s brother Andrew, who was removed from royal duties in 2019 after a BBC interview about his friendship with the convicted sex offender. (Epstein died in jail that year while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.) Public outrage reached a high last fall — stoked by media reports of documents from Epstein’s estate and a biography critical of Andrew — with the king being heckled over the friendship. Andrew, who has denied wrongdoing, was formally stripped of his titles and evicted from the palatial Windsor mansion where he’d lived effectively rent-free for years. Andrew was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office — police are investigating whether he may have passed Epstein confidential information while serving as a trade ambassador for the British government. After relocating to a smaller home on Charles’ country estate in Norfolk, Andrew has finally receded from British headlines.
Attention has now shifted to the prime minister and his government’s appointment of an Epstein associate, Peter Mandelson, as ambassador to the United States despite concerns raised in the vetting process. (Mandelson, who has acknowledged a friendship with Epstein but denied other wrongdoing, was fired last September over the connection.) Starmer’s choices are bad and worse: “Either he has to admit he misled, let’s put it kindly, Parliament, or he has to effectively argue, ‘I know very little about what goes on inside my government, so I couldn’t have known this,’” a political scientist at the London School of Economics told the New York Times this month.
For Charles — who in December announced that doctors planned to scale back treatments for a cancer diagnosis he revealed in 2024 — a successful trip serves a domestic purpose, too: reminding British taxpayers of the value of “working royals” at a moment when the institution is contending with both scandal and a aging roster of senior figures. A photo of such royals, released last week to mark 100 years since the birth of Elizabeth II, showed only two people younger than 50.
The schedule, timed down the second, does not mention the king’s younger son, Prince Harry, and his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, who live in California. Harry made headlines last week calling for American “leadership” during a speech from Ukraine. Trump, in remarks to the BBC, said that he “speaks for the UK more than Prince Harry” does.
The elephant in the room is the host. Charles can deliver toasts, lay wreaths and charm the rooms he is put in. What he cannot do is steady a president who picks fights with popes and prime ministers. Royal statecraft generally assumes that the other party is operating within recognizable conventions. This week, Charles does not have that assurance.
The royals have been on display under intense pressure before. In 1981, during the British sovereign’s annual birthday parade, a teenager fired six blanks at Queen Elizabeth. Burmese, the horse the queen was riding side-saddle, rushed forward at the sounds. Elizabeth quickly regained control — and rode on as though nothing had happened, even as police sprang into action around her. Her eldest son, Charles, was on horseback behind her.
He’s about to need to model that fortitude again.
Autumn Brewington is a senior opinion editor at MS NOW. A longtime editor at The Washington Post, she oversaw the paper's op-ed page for more than seven years. She also wrote a Post blog and newsletter about the British royal family. She writes about royalty on Substack at http://autumnbrewington.substack.com.