The emerging new deal between the U.S. and Iran, first reported by Axios, to extend a fragile ceasefire for 60 days and begin negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program is a victory for Iran in four ways — and a win for the United States in only one.
“Overall this is a victory for Iran, which endured over a month of bombing, closed the strait, kept it closed and only agreed to reopen it via negotiated settlement with the United States,” Gregory Brew, a senior Iran and oil analyst at the Eurasia Group, told MS NOW. “None of the stated war goals of the Trump administration — replacing the regime, re-creating the success in Venezuela, obtaining a sweeping nuclear deal or even forcing opened the strait — were obtained.”
In a major win for the U.S, the proposed memorandum of understanding, which is still pending approval from President Donald Trump, says ship movements through the Strait of Hormuz will be “unrestricted” and no fees or tolls will be charged. For weeks, Iran has insisted that it retain control of the strait with Oman and be able to charge ships fees.
Iran would also be required to remove all mines from the strait within 30 days, U.S. officials told MS NOW. And the U.S. Navy’s blockade of Iranian ports would be lifted in proportion to the restoration of commercial shipping through the strait. The U.S. would also issue some sanctions waivers to allow Iran to sell oil.
In a triumph for Iran, there is no agreement in the emerging deal regarding Iran’s nuclear program or its stockpile of enriched uranium. The memorandum, according to Axios, contains “an Iranian commitment not to pursue a nuclear weapon.” That is not new. Iranian leaders have said for years that they will not pursue a nuclear weapon.
Under the agreement, which MS NOW has not independently reviewed, negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear program will take place during the new 60-day ceasefire, which was one of Iran’s demands.
Second, the memorandum contains no agreement on what will happen to Iran’s 1,000 pounds of highly enriched uranium or its enrichment program. It states that those issues will be the first discussed in the 60-days of talks, the U.S. official said.
Axios reported that the two sides will discuss how to “dispose” of Iran’s enriched uranium, which experts have said could mean allowing Iran to down-blend the uranium to a lower enrichment level and keep it inside Iran.
Iran offered to do that before the war began, according to negotiators. Trump instead attacked Iran and has repeatedly demanded that the Islamic Republic hand over its enriched uranium to the U.S.
Third, there is no mention of limiting Iran’s missile stockpile, which U.S. officials hoped to destroy during the war. The latest U.S. intelligence assessments found that 70% of Iran’s missile stockpile survived the war. Iran will still be able to threaten Israel and Gulf countries with its missiles.
Fourth, there is no mention of Iran’s proxies, such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. One of the goals when Trump announced the war was to ensure that Iran’s “proxies can no longer destabilize the region.”
Nicole Grajewski, an assistant professor at Sciences Po in Paris and an associate at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, noted that Iran does not appear to get relief from sanctions in the MOU, a concession it has demanded. But she agreed that Iran got the best of the talks.








