With just two and a half days left to avert a partial government shutdown, Senate Democrats are presenting a largely unified front in demanding sweeping changes to a Department of Homeland Security funding bill.
By contrast, Senate Republicans are showing signs of division.
It’s not that Republicans are embracing Democratic proposals. After Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., outlined his demands Wednesday — an end to “roving patrols” by immigration officers, accountability for agents who violate rules, and a “masks off, body cameras on” policy for immigration agents — Republicans were quick to criticize his offer.
But GOP senators are split on Schumer’s fallback proposal: To strip the DHS funding bill from the larger package of government spending bills and pass the measures that have bipartisan support.
Schumer said Wednesday that breaking up the package would be “simple to do.”
“I am quite confident it would pass overwhelmingly,” he told reporters.
The current spending package under consideration covers roughly 80% of the federal government’s annual discretionary budget. Removing the DHS bill and passing the rest would effectively fund about 96% of agency spending for the year, after Congress already funded six of the 12 appropriations bills over the last few months.
It’s an idea that at least some Republicans are getting behind.
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said lawmakers should move ahead with the portions of government funding that Republicans and Democrats agree on and then buy more time to work out an agreement on DHS with a continuing resolution.
“At this juncture, the smart play is to carve out the Homeland Security bill, and we can fight over that, but in the meantime, try to do a CR and pass the other bills,” Kennedy told reporters Thursday.
The question is how many other Republican senators would go along with the plan. Schumer said he thinks there are currently “six or seven” Republican senators who support the plan.
To clear the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold, however, it would take 13 Republicans to sign on to Schumer’s proposal. And then House members would have to return from a recess in order to pass a revised bill and send the proposal to the president’s desk. Otherwise, most of the federal government will shutter come Saturday morning.
Kennedy said plenty of Republican lawmakers privately support the strategy of splitting DHS off from the larger package, but don’t want to say it publicly.
“Behind the scenes, most other Republicans agree with me,” Kennedy said.
At least two others have openly said so. When asked if she would be amenable to breaking up the funding package, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, gave a terse “yeah.”
Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., also said he would support splitting up the six-bill package into two.
The five non-controversial bills — which would fund the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, the Treasury, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, Education, and others — could pass easily, Rounds said.
“We want to do as much as we can,” he told reporters. “And it is a possibility of doing the five bills and then bringing back in the other one on a short-term continuing resolution as the one item that continues to be talked about.”
Kennedy, Murkowski and Rounds are all members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
As lawmakers fight over the best way to avoid as much of a government shutdown as possible, Democrats are adamant they won’t go along with DHS funding without new restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other immigration agencies.
“This is necessary,” Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J., told MS NOW. “What is more important for us as senators than the safety of the American people?”
“The American people are scared,” he said, adding that he’s hearing from people that are carrying around their passports now as a precaution.
Government funding — including the DHS bill — had looked like it was on a glide path last week. And then immigration officers fatally shot Alex Pretti in Minnesota on Saturday. That dramatic moment sparked outrage nationwide and crystallized for Democrats that they needed immigration enforcement reforms.
But actually getting Republicans onboard with their proposed changes could be much harder.









