In January, Irma Ojeda, a 72-year-old grandmother from Jackson, Michigan, urged local officials at a county commissioners meeting to rescind their partnership with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. President Donald Trump, she told the assembled, operated outside the law, and for proof, they needed look no further than the internet.
“I would like everyone to listen to Sascha Riley’s audio,” she said, “and you will get a whole ’nother story of what’s going on. And nobody’s talking about it.”
That same week, at a city council meeting in Spokane, Washington, left-wing activist Mikki Hatfield argued for two minutes against the city accepting federal funding for policing. Taking the money would be “capitulating to the rules of a sadistic pedophile,” they said. “I highly encourage you to look up Sascha Riley.”
Those who seek out Riley will find, on what has become a popular Substack, more than four hours of audio laying out a sprawling and outlandish story of a 52-year-old Iraq War veteran who said he was trafficked and abused as a child in the 1980s at the hands of his adoptive father — a pilot he said flew for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — and a network of men who now occupy the highest positions in American life: members of Congress, a Supreme Court justice and the president of the United States. The story, told through a series of viral interviews with a woman who presents herself as a kind of investigator for abuse victims, is disturbing and includes allegations of child pornography, forced fight clubs, animal killings and snuff films.
Outside of Riley’s testimony, there is no evidence any of it happened. Still, for a network of people that includes half a million of his followers and a broader online audience engrossed by the Epstein files, Riley’s story is confirmation of their darkest beliefs about the man in the White House.
If the right-wing conspiracist community QAnon has held that Trump is secretly saving the world from a pedophile cabal, its left-wing counterpart, derided as “BlueAnon,” has posited the inverse: that the president is a serial child abuser. Those crimes will only be brought to light, this theory goes, by child victims who come forward and the online supporters who dare believe them.
Like QAnon, this community has self-styled investigators who have compiled specious evidence, and creators who have packaged the narratives for millions of followers. Along the way, they too have ensnared regular, innocent people into their false theories, a practice that has time and again led to real harm. Most ironically for this left-leaning congregation of conspiracists, their insistence on unverified claims has only contributed to a post-truth environment that benefits the very people in power they have sought to fight: politicians such as Trump, who have pointed to the claims as proof that every accusation is a hoax.
The release of the Epstein files — a trove of millions of documents that revealed new details about the late financier’s network and decades of abuse of women and girls — also sparked a feverish hunt for something more to be true: that Trump has not merely been credibly accused of harassment and abuse by women, but he also abused children and participated in Epstein’s crimes.
That unfounded narrative was fueled through a 2016 lawsuit by a pseudonymous plaintiff, who dropped the case days before the election, and more recently by an unverified claim from a woman who told the FBI she was sexually assaulted by Trump in the 1980s, when she was 13 years old. Trump has consistently denied these accounts, calling them “disgusting” and a “hoax.”
Riley’s narrative may be the most elaborate and popular one to fuel the BlueAnon theory yet. And though my beat involves reporting on conspiracy theories, I grappled with whether and how to cover this one, mainly because the story’s architect seemed to be a victim too — of what, I wasn’t yet sure.
But for the past several months, believers have shown up at city council meetings and flooded social media with Riley’s claims, which have targeted not just Trump but regular people in Riley’s orbit. In January, Rosie O’Donnell urged 2.9 million TikTok followers to “bear witness” to Riley’s story.
So, in March, I did.
* * *
I met Sascha Riley in the lobby of a hotel in downtown Victoria, British Columbia, on a gray morning. In his profile photos, Riley has long blond hair and wears sunglasses. But when I met him, he wore his hair short and was dressed professionally: in a mustard button-down, khakis and loafers. We walked for hours through the spitting rain, along the harbor and into downtown, eventually settling into a tiny Filipino coffee shop.
Victoria, with its harbor vistas and progressive politics, was a “little slice of heaven,” he said, a welcome change from Duncan, Oklahoma, where he lived until August.

Riley spent his childhood in Tennessee, Alabama and Texas, moving with his family, which included his father, stepmother and two stepsiblings, wherever his dad’s work as a helicopter pilot and instructor took them. As Riley remembered, he was a hotheaded teen, and a fistfight outside an Alabama Hardee’s landed him in court, where a judge gave him a choice: jail or the U.S. Army. He chose the latter. He served about seven years at North Carolina’s Fort Bragg in the 1990s before he got a job welding in Arizona. He rejoined the Army after 9/11 and did three tours in Iraq, getting married along the way to a woman he met in Oklahoma.
Riley spoke softly. He didn’t want to talk much about his experience in the war or the post-traumatic stress disorder he said came after it. Combat was “a series of impossible decisions for which there is no right answer,” he said. “And you have the rest of your life to think about whether or not you got it right.”
Riley said the blame for whatever happened over there ultimately belonged with the politicians who started the war.
“However you process it, you can’t get around the truth: that if we hadn’t been fed a bunch of lies, we wouldn’t have been over there,” he said.
Service records showed Riley retired at the rank of Army sergeant first class in 2016. He reentered civilian life in Oklahoma with his wife and their 10-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter. They started a small trucking business, driving cars between states for their owners, but struggled financially, and Riley filed for bankruptcy in 2018. He was also dealing with the physical toll of 21 years of service, which included being “blown up” a couple of times, and the mental and emotional scars he had seen a therapist for.

Around 2020, though he can’t quite explain how, Riley started to “unlock” memories of abuse he said had been “repressed.” Riley said the memories came in fragments: replayed conversations and vague recollections of his father, powerful people and pain. Riley told me he spent months alone, listening to music, until the memories “solidified.” He said the memories were partly to blame for his separation from his wife in 2021 and their divorce two years later. According to Pearleen Riley (she kept her kids’ last name after the split), this was partly true.
She said Sascha always had a temper, but his new memories — she considered them psychotic delusions — scared her and the kids. She said he would spend days lying in bed with his laptop, reading and posting about politics, as well as “researching.” There, he came to the conclusion that he had dissociative identity disorder, formerly known as multiple personality disorder, a rare condition in which a person can develop distinct identities and lapses in memory, sometimes in response to severe childhood trauma. (Research has found that social media content about DID has fueled a wave of self-diagnosis.) Pearleen said Sascha would sometimes take on the personality and the accent of a young girl, whom he said he knew as a boy and who was also the victim of the child abuse cabal.
Pearleen said she left on April 6, 2021. Sascha no longer speaks to their children.
A couple of months after his family left, Sascha went public with his recovered memories, posting them to Facebook under his birth name, Sascha Barros. In a series of posts, he told a violent and fantastical story.
Sascha said he was adopted at 4 years old, only to be trafficked in the 1980s by his adoptive father, William Kyle Riley, through a brothel in Duncan, Oklahoma, and at “parties” on farms in Tennessee and Alabama, claims his father would later deny. Sascha said he was about 9 years old when he was first forced to make pornographic films, and he alleged his father sold him to a network of wealthy men, among them Trump and future members of Congress Jim Jordan and Andy Biggs. Sascha told tales of murders, describing the deaths of three girls — Sarah, who asked to be shot by another child; a girl with freckles, who was shot by a group of men at a child abuse “party”; and Sammy, whom Sascha said he choked to death in a kind of mercy killing. In September 2021, he posted: “Donald J Trump. The first time he raped me went like this.” In that post, Sascha described Trump killing a litter of puppies and then raping him. Sacha described fighting back, by impaling Trump with a wooden tent stake, writing that Trump “let out a scream like a banshee and had to be air lifted out.”
Sascha’s posts read like fiction; his claims beg for skepticism. The dates in his stories place his alleged abusers together at a heinous crime scene decades before they rose to prominence in right-wing politics. Jordan and Biggs would have been students in college. Trump was already a famous, wealthy New York real estate developer and tabloid fixture whose appearance at a hospital with such an injury would surely have attracted some attention. And the setting for what Sascha described as a cabal of wealthy elites gathering to abuse and murder children would be sleepy Southern towns such as Enterprise, Alabama — best known for its monument honoring the boll weevil and the headquarters of U.S. Army Aviation at its border.
The posts “never really gained traction,” Sascha remembered, adding that his family and friends didn’t believe him.
“That’s probably been the hardest part. Expecting a certain response from the people that you know and love and care about, and then not necessarily getting that response,” he said.
Sascha called the FBI and the police in Lawton, Oklahoma, at the time. Texts between an agent with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation and a member of Sascha’s family showed the state had looked into his allegations. OSBI said records from any investigation, if they existed, would be confidential and not open to the public. In the end, nothing came of it.
It would be four years before Sascha found the attention and support he was looking for.
* * *
In the summer of 2025, Sascha got a direct message from Lisa Voldeng. Describing herself as a Canadian entrepreneur with connections, she said she believed his story and could help him find justice. Voldeng recorded hours of interviews with him and decided he should move to Canada for his own safety. Voldeng helped him find a place minutes away from her home.
In November, Voldeng published six tapes of her interviews with Sascha. Before those posts, Voldeng’s Substack was sparse — a few nature photos, thoughts on media and woo-woo musings that got dozens of likes, sometimes a few shares. Her post with Sascha’s interviews garnered 30,000 interactions, and she now has the 17th most popular Substack in the international category, with 77,000 followers. Sometime in March, she made the interviews with Sascha available only to paid subscribers; it’s unclear how many of them pay $35 a month for full access.

In the tapes, Sascha’s story expanded from his earlier Facebook posts, with new allegations against other prominent conservatives, including a Supreme Court justice and more current members of Congress. Unlikely helpers were added too, with Sascha saying Jane Goodall, the primatologist, worked with him as an almost feral child. And the Epstein connection, which was absent from his Facebook posts, became central to the story, with Voldeng framing Sascha’s abuse as part of a “Trump-Epstein ring,” and his father a pilot for the convicted sex offender.
After two hourlong phone calls with her, asking as many different ways as I knew how, I cannot say with confidence what Voldeng does.
In the early 2000s, Voldeng created a superhero comic called Überbabe, the main character of which was described by one outlet at the time as a sassy bisexual crime-fighter battling “the forces of fear and bigotry.” One of Voldeng’s many websites lists her work as including (in alphabetical order): advertising, aerospace, defense, education, energy, environment, finance, governance, law, media, science, technology and “realms of sheer starlit wonder.”
Her umbrella venture is Ultra-Agent Industries, a Victoria-based company she described as a media and technology lab that, according to the website, builds markets, companies, experiences, products, services and technologies.
Voldeng also claimed to be working with more than 20 other survivors. Some, she said, are Epstein survivors, others are victims of what she called “ritual abuse,” or the sexual and physical abuse of children as part of occult or satanic rituals. (This kind of widespread abuse has been repeatedly and thoroughly debunked. Its most famous recent era was during the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, when coercive therapies produced a wave of false allegations that destroyed communities and led to wrongful prosecutions. The panic lives on in online communities and sometimes reappears in the real world.)

In January, Voldeng announced to her followers that she had “filed a case” for those survivors with the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. What this meant, according to a copy she shared with me, was that she submitted Sascha’s claims via an online form to the Special Procedures mechanism of the council, a process that allows individuals to flag alleged human rights violations to independent U.N. experts. She has not received a response.
Voldeng has posted that the girls and young women who are survivors of Epstein are a distraction — part of a “false narrative” engineered to obscure the real victims: small children and boys, most of whom were killed, she said, leaving Sascha as the sole survivor.
When asked directly what expertise she brought to survivors of trafficking or child abuse, Voldeng said, “My approach is proactive and pre-emptive.” Her team, she said, is “a mix of Red Cross meets Jedi Knights.”
Voldeng didn’t respond to my request to meet in Victoria. And by the time I got home, she had cut ties with Sascha entirely. She released a statement on Substack last week, saying he was acting “erratically” and “has a reckless disregard for safety and security.”
“During the past few months Sascha has also told falsehoods, and endangered the innocent,” Voldeng wrote.
Sascha had a different version of their falling out. He told me he had lost faith in Voldeng and that she didn’t deliver.
“I think she may be a self-serving con artist,” he said.
Asked whether she might be exploiting vulnerable people, Voldeng said via phone call that such criticism was part of a coordinated campaign against her, orchestrated by pedophile conspirators associated with lawyers who represented Epstein’s victims.
“The truth speaks for itself,” she said.
Before I left Canada, I told Sascha what would come next: I would try to verify what he told me, and I would call people who knew him, including his dad.











