In Minnesota, state election officials are gaming out how to respond if armed ICE agents show up at polling places this November.
In the nation’s capital, congressional Democrats are discussing how to respond if a Republican governor sends National Guard troops into a Democratic stronghold on election day to lower turnout.
And in multiple private conversations, former national security and law enforcement officials are considering the best legal strategies to defend the midterm elections against interference by Trump administration officials, including FBI agents seizing voting machines on election day.
President Donald Trump’s call for the GOP to “nationalize” elections is spurring many officials, lawyers and lawmakers across the U.S. to bolster their defenses against election interference. While many Republicans brush off the president’s threats, election officials are rushing to organize meetings and conference calls to prepare for scenarios in which Trump might use federal agents, troops or MAGA-aligned local officials to interfere in elections.
“This now belongs in the same category as a power outage, a bomb threat, a weather incident, because it would be irresponsible now for us not to plan what the response would look like,” Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon told MS NOW.
The threat of the Trump administration trying to interfere in the midterm elections is being taken seriously, he said, citing Trump’s deployment of federal agents and military to some American cities and recent calls by his allies for such forces to be placed near polling stations.
“We’ve now gotten to the point, sadly, in 2026 where the process of federal interference with our elections — either directly or indirectly — is something that we have to game out and plan for,” Simon said.
In response to a request for commend, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement that the “Civil Rights Act, National Voting Rights Act and Help America Vote Act all give the Department of Justice full authority to ensure states comply with federal election laws, which mandate accurate state voter rolls. President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections, and that includes totally accurate and up-to-date voter rolls free of errors and unlawfully registered non-citizen voters.”
Last Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that while she hasn’t heard the president discuss plans to put ICE agents outside polling places, she “can’t guarantee that an ICE agent won’t be around a polling location in November.”
A Democratic congressional staffer said oversight committees are studying specific election-day scenarios involving troops. This person said a Republican governor, for example, could deploy National Guard troops into large blue cities in their state, such as New Orleans or Mobile, Alabama, to reduce turnout.
“In a place like Mobile, having troops outside polling stations is going to lower turnout,” said the staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. Such an action could potentially impact the outcome of close congressional races that may determine control of the House.
A former senior national security official said the recent seizure of voting machines by Gabbard and FBI Director Kash Patel in Fulton County, Georgia, may have been a test run for the midterm elections.
“These are steps to essentially take over and manipulate the midterms,” said the former official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation.
The official said Gabbard and FBI officials, for example, could declare on election day that they have evidence a foreign adversary is manipulating vote totals — in order to seize voting machines before votes have been counted.
“The most nightmarish thing is federal searches and seizures of voting machines on election day,” said the former official.
Officials sought to avoid publicly discussing the multiple methods they’re considering to counter Trump, wary of giving the administration a “roadmap.” But one example, Simon said, is to lean into a Minnesota law that states only certain people — such as voters, election workers and political party observers — can be within 100 feet of a polling place entrance.
“Other than that, no one is allowed, even law enforcement,” said Simon. “There’s a specific provision that says law enforcement is not allowed preemptively in a polling place.”









