After a Ferguson, Missouri, police officer killed teenaged resident Michael Brown in August 2014 and the 21st Century Task Force on Policing was formed, across the United States, a foundational principle of policing emerged: Any agency involved in a shooting incident must consent to a thorough, unbiased and transparent investigation conducted by an independent outside entity. This principle exists to maintain what the task force identified as the three pillars of policing in a democracy: trust, integrity and legitimacy.
Federal agents have effectively been granted immunity from this standard.
Yet as we saw after immigration agents shot dead 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis on Saturday, Trump administration officials have largely been acting as if federal immigration agents have immunity from this standard, creating a dangerous two-tiered system of accountability where federal officers operate above the scrutiny applied to their state and local counterparts.
The only information we have regarding the two agents involved in Pretti’s death comes from a Department of Homeland Security official who spoke to MS NOW on the condition of anonymity and said, per Border Patrol’s policy, they were placed on paid administrative leave for three days and met with a mental health professional. That source also said they’ll be placed on desk duty pending an internal investigation. But we have reasons to worry about the integrity of that investigation.
I have devoted my entire professional life, more than four decades, to public safety and law enforcement, and I view the killing of Pretti, an intensive care unit nurse at a VA hospital, as a critical inflection point for democracy, decency and law enforcement in the U.S. It is a moment of reckoning, and if it isn’t adequately addressed, it threatens to tear down more than a decade of hard-won progress in police-community relations.
Videos of immigration agents shooting Pretti reveal agents who are, at best, grossly undertrained and poorly supervised, conducting operations with a level of recklessness that is unconscionable — indeed, unthinkable — in professional law enforcement. Reports indicate that federal agents closed off the crime scene to state and local investigators, contaminated evidence and removed witnesses, including those officers who were at the scene of the shooting, out of state. These actions are at odds with long-established and, at least since the aforementioned Michael Brown case, universally accepted investigative protocols.
Moving forward, the federal government must implement four essential reforms related to independent investigations, standardized training, increased supervision and scene preservation.
These actions are at odds with universally accepted investigative protocol.
Though the federal government ought to have a role in investigating shootings that involve federal agents, the first thing we need is a policy that mandates that any such shooting also be investigated by an independent state or county agency, working in partnership with federal investigators where appropriate.
This investigation must be credible, legitimate, transparent and conducted in a nonpartisan manner. That last part is particularly crucial given the current political climate. The investigating body must have unfettered access to the scene, evidence and witnesses from the moment an incident occurs. In the present case, law enforcement officials in Minnesota have said that the federal government has blocked their efforts to investigate Pretti’s killing.








