It’s been 12 days since Donald Trump used his social media platform to make a vague announcement about a possible end to the war with Iran. A “peace” agreement, the president wrote, “has been largely negotiated.” He added that the details of the breakthrough deal would be “announced shortly,” raising hopes around the world that the end of the deadly and destabilizing war was imminent.
Roughly 48 hours later, U.S. military leaders announced a series of “self-defense” strikes in southern Iran. Despite an ostensible ceasefire that’s been in place for weeks, the violence is ongoing. The Associated Press reported:
The United States said Monday that it bombed radar and drone sites in Iran after Tehran shot down an American drone over the weekend. Iran then said it launched a strike of its own, and Kuwait reported incoming fire. […]
The U.S. military’s Central Command said it carried out the strikes in Iran on Saturday and Sunday around the city of Geruk and on Qeshm Island.
Around this time a week ago, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that a breakthrough might take “a few more days.” Evidently, the meaning of “few” remains flexible.
Indeed, the broader dynamic is a familiar one: We’re left with a ceasefire in which the fire hasn’t ceased, and a burgeoning peace deal that lacks both peace and a deal.
Complicating matters is the degree to which the American president’s public statements about the war offer little in the way of clarity or consistency. As The New York Times reported, “Three months after President Trump launched war on Iran, his seemingly haphazard approach to the conflict is bewildering allies at home and abroad as he veers between diplomatic dealing, military strikes and increasingly far-fetched ideas.”
The Times added that Trump’s “pendulum swings on Iran have often seemed driven by mood and moment rather than any discernible strategy.”
There’s ample evidence that bolsters the point. In recent days, for example, the Republican has insisted that any agreement include Iran turning over its highly enriched uranium. He’s also recently said the opposite, arguing that Iran’s uranium stockpiles are really just a “public relations” issue and the goal isn’t altogether “necessary.”








