Oral arguments began in a Texas court on Tuesday to determine whether the Affordable Care Act can require insurers to provide preventive medication, which includes access to contraception and medicines or tests for sexually transmitted viruses like HIV.
To be frank: The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, filed back in 2020, are offering the dumbest argument imaginable for refusing these medications.
In the complaint, filed on behalf of several conservative Texas residents, the plaintiffs claim employers shouldn’t be forced to provide an HIV prophylactic medication known as PrEP because they say it incentivizes “homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity, and intravenous drug use.”
“It also compels religious employers and religious individuals who purchase health insurance to subsidize these behaviors as a condition of purchasing health insurance,” the lawsuit alleges. And that ridiculous argument could win out, because it’s being heard by a district judge appointed by then-President George W. Bush, who has issued ultraconservative rulings in the past, including judgments against the Affordable Care Act.
But facts matter, and this is an idiotic argument that relies on a lot of conservative bigotry to get within even a mile of a valid point. For one, PrEP isn’t a drug merely for non-heterosexual people. It’s a drug for anyone at risk of contracting HIV. Sex workers and so-called “promiscuous” people obviously aren’t the only ones who can contract HIV. And no, there’s literally no evidence suggesting taking HIV medicine makes you more likely to inject drugs into your veins.








