Donald Trump’s election win, aided in part by online disinformation, has reignited the debate over whether the First Amendment’s protections are adequate in today’s digital age. The contemporary understanding of the First Amendment’s free speech clause is anchored in the "marketplace of ideas" theory, but this notion is under severe strain in an era where information is filtered through algorithms engineered to prioritize profit over truth. Professor Mary Anne Franks argues that our ideas of free speech have never truly aligned with reality; throughout American history, the struggle for free speech has fundamentally been a fight for access, with the clause often used to subordinate the perspectives of women and minorities. “The First Amendment has actually played a very small role in defending the rights of those who have spoken out most radically against oppression,” Franks says, adding that in order to confront contemporary threats to democracy, we must first reckon with this history of suppression. Ultimately, “the First Amendment belongs to us,” she says.Nov. 24, 2024
UP NEXT
Trump ‘firehoses’ people with ‘nutty rhetoric’ – and it’s meant to wear people out
07:29
‘Asbestos with better PR and a bigger checkbook’: Big tech goes unchecked in U.S.
10:20
‘The way to do the work is slowly, surely, and over time’: Corporate America and DEI
11:56
‘No safe place’: People of Sudan ‘dying from neglect’
08:08
The modern history Israeli-Lebanese relations
06:55
Velshi Banned Book Club: ‘That Librarian’ stands up to censorship
