Supreme Court

Both justices previously ruled against student speech rights. Thomas has questioned whether those rights even exist.

This week’s Deadline: Legal Newsletter looks at a Supreme Court order that, according to the dissent, made "new law" on presidential power.

It’s the latest Supreme Court order prompted by the Trump administration’s urgent requests for legal relief.

“Deadline: White House” legal analyst Jordan Rubin answers your questions about the Supreme Court, Trump administration lawsuits and other issues.

The Democratic appointees said in dissent that the majority “favors the President over our precedent.”

Oklahoma’s Republican attorney general had argued that drastic consequences would follow if the justices sided with the school.

The state’s attorney general had said such intervention by the justices would be unprecedented.

The Trump administration sought to end Biden-era protections. Plaintiffs alleged racial animus was behind the decision.

Contrary to the president's reaction, the Supreme Court on Friday emphasized that the government can still conduct normal removals.

“Every day that goes by, it’s more cost, more trauma, more questions,” Adriana Smith's mother told a local NBC News affiliate.

The court previously granted Texas detainees emergency relief, over dissent from Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.